Global Weather Phenomenon-Natural/Technological Disasters-Space Events-Epidemic/Biological Hazards-
Nuclear Events :
News Affiliate of Family Survival Protocol.com
Speaking at a United Nations “climate” summit in Paris, Obama blamed America for alleged man-made global warming and claimed that the nation embraces its responsibility to “do something” about the alleged problem. That “something,” of course, at least in the administration's view, involves redistributing the wealth of embattled U.S. taxpayers to Third World governments and dictatorships for climate reparations, as well as shackling the American economy with draconian controls to reduce emissions of what serious scientists know as the “gas of life.” Sounding like a wannabe messiah, Obama even claimed that “we finally determined we would save our planet.” However, lawmakers in Congress and the American people have made clear that they neither believe in the increasingly discredited anthropogenic global-warming (AGW) theory nor in the alleged solutions to the supposed problem.
Dictators and other heads of state have typically arrived at UN conferences toward the end of the show. This time, however, hoping desperately to secure a global “climate” agreement where past summits have failed, UN organizers decided Obama and other “world leaders” should show up at the start. Obama complied, spewing gargantuan amounts of CO2 and arriving in Paris to deliver various speeches hyping the AGW theory, along with illegal pledges to hand out your money. “I've come here personally, as the leader of the world's largest economy and the second-largest emitter, to say that the United States of America not only recognizes our role in creating this problem, we embrace our responsibility to do something about it,” Obama claimed at the ongoing conference, which featured some 150 dictators and heads of government and state.
Of course, Obama is not the “leader” of the “world's largest economy.” His job description is to serve as the chief executive of the federal government, to faithfully execute the laws, and to uphold and defend the Constitution. His other claims were even more ludicrous. For instance, the notion that America recognizes its alleged role in creating the alleged problem could not be more wrong. According to a Pew survey released last year, just 40 percent of Americans even believe the increasingly discredited AGW theory. And without a doubt, far less than that would agree that the nation should shackle its economy and redistribute its wealth to Third World regimes under the guise of dealing with a problem that the overwhelming majority of Americans do not even believe exists.
Obama blames America for non-existent global warming
Barack Obama speaks at U.N. climate summit.
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
While speaking at the United Nations on Tuesday, President Obama blamed the United States for global warming, even though there has been no global warming for nearly 18 years. While the administration insists global warming is a real threat, one professor issued a paper saying there has been no global warming for 19 years.
"But there should be no question that the United States of America is stepping up to the plate," Obama said. "We recognize our role in creating this problem; we embrace our responsibility to combat it. We will do our part, and we will help developing nations do theirs. But we can only succeed in combating climate change if we are joined in this effort by every nation –- developed and developing alike. Nobody gets a pass."
Obama hyped action the United States has taken, touting moves taken against power companies in what has been described as a "war on coal." According to the president, the United States has reduced its total "carbon pollution" by more than any other nation.
Carolyn is a staff writer for Science and is the editor of the In Brief section.
..........
It’s getting hot in here. A dispute between the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) over a climate change paper published this summer is escalating. The latest salvos include a second letter from Representative Lamar Smith (R–TX) to NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan seeking internal communications and documents authored by NOAA employees and a letter from the American Meteorological Society condemning Smith’s demands and warning about its implications for all federally funded research.
The quarrel began with a paper by NOAA scientists published 5 June in Science that revised historical atmosphere and ocean temperature data records found to have been poorly calibrated. In 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had noted that the temperature data seemed to suggest that global warming had slowed down beginning around 1998. But the Science paper showed that apparent slowdown in global warming vanished when the data were corrected to account for various sources of bias.
That paper immediately caught Smith’s attention, triggering multiple committee requests for data and methodologies related to the study. NOAA told the committee that the findings were already publicly available and met twice with committee staff to brief them on the results.
But that response didn’t satisfy Smith. On 13 October, he subpoenaed all of NOAA’s internal emails related to the paper, asking for the information by 27 October. In response, the committee’s Democrats wrote to Smith on 23 October, noting that the subpoena “appears to be furthering a fishing expedition” and saying that it oversteps the committee’s bounds, as the paper is a research study and not a policy decision. House Republican leadership this year had given Smith the authority to issue subpoenas without the consent of the minority party.
Did Federal Agency Commit Climate Fraud? Sure Looks Like It
10/28/2015 06:30 PM ET
Junk Science: Worried about climate fraud, Congress is investigating a federal agency for allegedly manipulating weather data to show recent global warming when there is none. So why is the agency refusing to cooperate?
First, a little background: Satellite temperature readings clearly show no warming trend for the last 18 years, 8 months and counting. None.
This fact is significant for two reasons: One, satellite temperature readings are the most comprehensive and thus the most accurate. And, two, the pause in warming since 1998 undercuts the entire global warming agenda of the environmental movement and its allies on the left who see in climate change an opportunity to impose greater government control over our lives.
Yes, we're skeptical of "climate change," at least as defined by the green extremists. Climate is always changing. No one denies that. What's at issue is how it's changing and why. The science is still unclear.
Earlier this year, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientists took part in a study that found — no surprise — that the "pause" in global warming from 1998 to 2013 didn't exist.
Their change didn't come from actual temperature readings. It came from extensive data manipulation and tinkering. Instead of a pause, they found a surge.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is refusing to hand over its climate scientists' emails to Rep. Lamar Smith.
See more at http://www.newsy.com/
Senators Seek To Force Approval Of Keystone XL Pipeline
Posted: Updated:
WASHINGTON
–- Senate supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline say they think they
have enough votes to pass a bill that would force the approval of the
controversial project. A group of 56 senators -- all 45 Republicans plus
11 Democrats –- introduced legislation on Thursday that would bypass
the Obama administration and grant approval for the pipeline.
Sens. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.) introduced the bill on Thursday.
Democrats Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Mark Begich (D-Alaska), Mark Pryor
(D-Ark.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), Claire McCaskill
(D-Mo.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), John Walsh
(D-Mont.), and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) are cosponsoring it.
Because it
crosses an international border, the decision on the pipeline falls
under the authority of the State Department. The State Department
announced another delay on a decision
last month in response to a court decision that invalidated the
pipeline's proposed route through Nebraska, saying that it would wait to
decide until there is more clarity on where the pipeline will
ultimately run. The legislation would grant approval to "any subsequent
revision to the pipeline route" in Nebraska, without requiring further
environmental analysis.
"We continue to hear delay, delay, delay
from the Administration about the Keystone XL pipeline. I’m beyond sick
of it," Heitkamp said in a statement Thursday. "We have strong
bipartisan support in the Senate for this project –- and I’m proud to
have recruited support from 10 other Democrats last month. Now, all of
those Democrats also signed onto this bill that we crafted to fully
approve the construction of the Keystone pipeline. If the Administration
isn’t going to make a decision on this project after more than five
years, then we’ll make it for them. End of story."
Hmmmm, alert the presses and let everyone know that in spite of the facts that :
Oil
spills are never properly cleaned up and the side effects of the
chemicals and toxins left behind linger for years.
Energy
Companies responsible for the spills are never truly held
accountable for all the damage done due to carelessness and cost
cutting to fatten their bottom line
Sea life , Coral
Reefs, and the food chain in oil spill damaged areas face death
at every turn. While the culprits shrug their shoulders and say
"Oh Well"
Coastlines are negatively impacted.
Damaging not only the ecology but the likelihood of those who
depend on a clean and healthy ocean to sustain themselves and their
families.
The Energy Companies walk away after
THEY feel they have done enough when in reality they fall
woefully short and the corrupt government taking corporate
kickbacks allows them to get away with their crimes with a slap
on the wrist.
In spite of all this destruction ........Oil Spills create jobs.
Would that also be the case for oil spills caused by,
oh
let's say, pipeline leaks and train derailments in populated areas
where not only people are affected, but their ground water and
lands are poisoned with chemicals and toxic oil that can never truly
be completely removed?
Yes indeed, that certainly is worth the jobs created alright......NOT!!
~Desert Rose~
.....
Kinder Morgan: Oil Spills' Economic Effects Are Both Good And Bad
The Huffington Post Canada | Posted: 05/01/2014 1:41 pm EDT | Updated: 05/01/2014 1:59 pm EDT
There is at least something of a bright side to oil spills, pipeline company Kinder Morgan says.
In a recent submission to the National Energy Board, the company says marine oil spills “can have both positive and negative effects on local and regional economies” thanks to the economic activity generated by cleanup operations.
“Spill
response and clean-up creates business and employment opportunities for
affected communities, regions, and clean-up service providers,” the
company says.
The comments appear in a 15,000-page application to the NEB to triple the capacity of its Trans Mountain Pipeline, which carries oil from Alberta to Port Metro Vancouver.
Environmentalists fear an increase in oil shipments through West Coast waters would increase the risk of oil tanker accidents.
Kinder
Morgan’s submission doesn’t ignore the negatives; it points out that
oil spills are devastating to fishing and tourism industries, and notes
the negative impacts on human health, damage to property and harm done
to “cultural resources.”
But it cites a 1990 research paper looking at the economic impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill to argue there are positive elements as well.
It's in the cards; spread of possible oil spill tracked by 'drift card' study
Apr 1, 2014 at 12:00PM updated at 2:33PM
Jennifer of Victoria and a friend show off a drift card that she found on Vancouver Island.
— image credit: Contributed photo/Friends of San Juans
Journal staff report
Conservation
groups from Washington and British Columbia commemorated the 25th
anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill by launching 650 ‘drift cards’
along Salish Sea oil tanker routes.
The
cards were dropped at two locations: off Turn Point, Stuart Island,
where Haro Strait intersects with Boundary Pass, and near Bird Rocks in
Rosario Strait. They carry a simple message: This Could Be Oil.
This
research responds to a sharp increase in fossil fuel export projects
proposed in British Columbia and Washington state. The proposed Gateway Pacific coal terminal
at Cherry Point north of Bellingham and Kinder Morgan’s increase in
tar-sands shipping from Vancouver, and other projects, would add an
additional 2,620 ship transits per year to the waters of the Salish Sea,
making the region one of North America’s busiest fossil fuel shipping
corridors.
“The
increased risk of a major oil spill in the Salish Sea is real," said
Stephanie Buffum, executive director of Friends of the San
Juans. "Anyone with a cultural, environmental or economic interest in
our region should get engaged with Coast Guard rulemaking; familiarize
themselves with effects of cargo traveling through our waters; and ask
decision makers to ensure diluted bitumen (oil sand) is classified as a
petroleum product that is taxed to fund oil spill clean-up efforts.”
Here are some of those job opportunities Kinder Morgan was referring to :
.....
BP pipeline sprays ‘oily mist’ over 33 acres of Alaskan tundra
Published time: May 01, 2014 03:15
Alaska
state officials confirmed Wednesday that an oily mist sprung from a
compromised oil pipeline and sprayed into the wind without stopping for
at least two hours, covering 33 acres of the frozen snow field in the
oil well's vicinity.
The discovery was at the BP-owned Prudhoe oil
field on Alaska’s North Slope, the northernmost region of the state
where a number of profitable oil fields sit beneath the tundra. The
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) revealed that BP
officials found the mist during a routine inspection on Monday.
Initial
reports said that 27 acres had been covered, although that figure was
updated later on Wednesday. The cause is still under investigation,
according to the Associated Press,
but officials know that the mist was made up of a mixture of gas, crude
oil, and water. They also reported that while the noxious mist was
distributed over such a wide area by 30 mph winds, no wildlife was
impacted.
BP spokeswoman Dawn Patience said the company is “still assessing repairs” and will soon know what, if any, long-term effects the spill could have.
The
Prudhoe Bay region, like elsewhere in the North Slope, is home to a
great number of migratory birds and caribou, as well as other animals,
such as a massive porcupine herd. Clean-up efforts are expected to be
complete before birds pass through the region again in the coming weeks.
The
company was at fault in at least two oil spills in the same region
since 2006. That year, an estimated 267,000 gallons of oil seeped
through a quarter-inch sized hole in a corroded BP pipeline. That
accident went unnoticed for five days, until an oil worker smelled the
aroma of crude when driving through the area, according to Think Progress.
Lynchburg, Virginia Train Derailment Sparks Fire, Fills Air With Plumes Of Black Smoke
The Huffington Post
Posted: Updated:
A CSX train derailed near downtown Lynchburg, Virginia around 2:30 p.m. on Wednesday, prompting evacuations and calls to avoid part of the city as flames and a plume of black smoke rose into the air. There are no immediate reports of injuries.
The City Of Lynchburg announced that the train was carrying crude oil and three or four of its 13 to 14 cars were breached.
"There is some spillage in the river of crude oil,"
Lynchburg city spokeswoman LuAnn Hunt told the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Richmond primarily draws its water from the James River, downstream
from Lynchburg. Another official said the city is making plans to tap an
"alternative water supply."
The train's tankers may be from a
class of rail cars deemed an "unacceptable public risk" by a member of
the National Transportation Safety Board in February. These black, pill-shaped cars, known as DOT-111s, have been involved in recent notable oil train derailments in North Dakota and Quebec.
"We are very clear that this issue needs to be acted on very quickly,"
National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman told
reporters last week. The Transportation Department is currently working
on stricter standards for rail tank cars used to transport hazardous
materials. "They aren't moving fast enough," Hersman said.
In February, Plains CEO Greg Armstrong said on the company's quarter four earnings call that Yorktown is ideally situated geographically to become an oil export mecca if the ban is lifted.
When
asked by an analyst from Bank of America about the ongoing debate over
lifting the crude oil export ban, Armstrong discussed how Plains could
stand to profit from exports.
http://www.democracynow.org
- The oil giant BP is back in court for the April 2010 accident that
caused the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, killing 11 workers
and leaking almost five million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of
Mexico. On Monday, the second phase of the trial began with lawyers
accusing the oil company of lying about how much oil was leaking,
failing to prepare for how to handle the disaster, and for not capping
the leak quick enough. We're joined in New Orleans by Monique Harden,
co-director of Advocates for Environmental Human Rights and an attorney
who specializes in environmental justice concerns in New Orleans. In the
aftermath of the BP spill, Harden's organization exposed how the oil
giant had contracted with a claims processing company that promoted its
record of reducing lost dollar pay-outs for injuries and damage caused
by its client companies. We are also joined by John Barry, vice
president of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority -- East,
which has brought a lawsuit against 97 oil and gas companies for
destruction of the Gulf coastline, making the area more at risk from
flooding and storm surges.
Democracy Now!, is an independent
global news hour that airs weekdays on 1,200+ TV and radio stations
Monday through Friday. Watch it live 8-9am ET at http://www.democracynow.org.
BP oil spill redirects here. For the
2006 oil spill involving BP, see Prudhoe Bay oil spill. For other uses,
see The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also refe.
BBC Stephen Fry
And The Great American Oil Spill BBC Documentary on BP Oil Spill
Disaster. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also referred to as the BP
oil sp.
documentary, documentaries, full documentary, history
documentary, documentary bbc, history channel documentary, documentary
history channel, national geogra.
documentary, documentaries,
full documentary, history documentary, documentary bbc, history channel
documentary, documentary history channel, national geogra.
TAGS:
Gulf Of Mexico (Body Of Water) Disaster (Quotation Subject) Oil Spill
(Disaster Type) Beach Flip Ocean May Cry Thomas Engine Storm Start Back
Front Tra.
Full documenary Channel.Please subscrible our channel
to watch more videos. Deepwater Disaster BP Oil Spill Documentary . All
our videos for just education.
Please Enjoy. Subscribe & Like
too. Thanks. Cheers! Stephen Fry loves Louisiana. Four months after the
BP oil spill, dubbed the worst ecological disaster in .
The
Deepwater Horizon oil spill, also called the BP Oil Spill, the Gulf of
Mexico oil spill or the Macondo blowout. I dont Own the Video Footage or
Images..
documentary, documentaries, full documentary, history
documentary, documentary bbc, history channel documentary, documentary
history channel, national geogra.
no description available
documentary, documentaries, full documentary, history documentary,
documentary bbc, history channel documentary, documentary history.
On
the three year memorial of the BP Oil Spill disaster I wanted to share
with you one very important fact. BP has been lying to you! Due to
decades of abuse.
Visit to find out how you can help! On April
20, 2010, the largest environmental disaster in US history began when
the Deepwater Horizo.
A documentary that examines the April 2010
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico following the sinking of the Deepwater
Horizon oil rig. News Feeds on the issue ht.
BP Oil Spill Timeline.
The
Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also referred to as the BP oil spill, the
BP oil disaster, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the Macondo blowout)
began on 2.
Please read the description! What really happened
with the cover-up of the Deep Water Horizon incident in the Gulf of
Mexico. Josh and Rebecca Tickell interv.
The Deepwater Horizon
oil spill (also referred to as the BP oil spill, the Gulf of Mexico oil
spill, the BP oil disaster or the Macondo blowout) is an oil sp.
This
video covers many environmental results of the BP Oil Spill, which
originated from a rig explosion on April 20, 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico,
placing an e.
Footage about the greatest oil disaster of all
times (2010 Gulf) Watch at our Planet like it would be your Child! dont
close your eyes! do your part!
.....
The 14,000 Oil Spills Nobody is Talking About | Brainwash Update
Abby Martin goes over updates to the
chemical spill in West Virginia and the coal-ash spill in North
Carolina, exposing the human and environmental impact as well as the
lack of accountability that accompanies tens of thousands of similar
ecological catastrophes that occur in the US every year due to the US'
addiction to fossil fuel. .....