Global Weather Phenomenon-Natural/Technological Disasters-Space Events-Epidemic/Biological Hazards-
Nuclear Events :
News Affiliate of Family Survival Protocol.com
Global
warming may be responsible for AMOC's slowdown but natural forces may
also be at work, NASA said. AMOC is part of the complex circulation of
currents that help take the warmer Gulf Stream water and move it through
the basin.
Data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites correspond with similar findings that were not satellite-based. The GRACE findings were published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
An AMOC slowdown would impact other currents throughout the Atlantic.
Strange things are happening in both outer and inner space
scientists
are discovering that the Solar System, the sun, and life itself are
mutating in totally unprecedented ways. They are reporting changes that
are being recorded in space that have never been seen before
Studies show that the Sun and the planets themselves are physically changing at
an accelerated pace. Most notably, they are undergoing major changesin their atmospheres.
Let's
begin with the Sun. The Sun is the center of our Solar System, and all
life that is on this Earth came from the Sun. If there were no Sun, we
would not be alive. This is simply scientific fact. And so any changes
that occur in or on the Sun will eventually affect every person alive.
We
know that the Sun's magnetic field has changed in the last 100 years.
There's a study by Dr. Mike Lockwood from Rutherford Appleton National
Laboratories, in California. Dr. Lockwood has been investigating the
Sun, and reports that since 1901 the overall magnetic field of the Sun
has become stronger by 130 percent.
Moon: Earth's moon is growing
an atmosphere . Around the moon, there is this 6,000- kilometre- deep
layer of Natrium that wasn't there before. http://sirius.bu.edu/moontail/
Mercury: Unexpected polar ice discovered, along with a surprisingly strong intrinsic magnetic field.
Venus: 2500% increase in auroral brightness, and substantive global atmospheric changes in less than 40 years.
Mars: “Global Warming,” huge storms, disappearance of polar icecaps.
Jupiter:
Over 200% increase in brightness of surrounding plasma clouds.(Huge
belts in the giant planet's atmosphere have changed color, radiation
hotspots have faded and flared up again, and cloud levels have thickened
and dissolved, all while space rocks have been hurtling into it the gas
giant.) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/...
Saturn:
Major decrease in equatorial jet stream velocities in only ~30 years,
accompanied by surprising surge of X-rays from equator.
Uranus: Big changes in brightness, increased global cloud activity (This planet used to have a very calm atmosphere. )
Neptune: 40% increase in atmospheric brightness. http://newsoffice.mit.edu/1998/triton
Earth: Substantial and obvious world-wide weather and geophysical changes. Earth's Axis has changed.
On
Earth, the overall volcanic activity increased 500 percent from 1875 to
1975, while the earthquake activity has increased by 400 percent since
1973. Dr. Dmitriev says that comparing the years 1963 to 1993, the
overall number of natural disasters — hurricanes, typhoons, mud slides,
tidal waves, etc. — has increased by 410 percent.
The Earth's
magnetic field has been decreasing. This decrease actually began 2000
years ago, but the rate of decrease suddenly became much more rapid 500
years ago. Now, in the last 20 years or so, the magnetic field has
become erratic.http://www.grahamhancock.com/phorum/r...
Music credit: YouTube Audio Library
1) It's Coming - Josh Kirsch & Media Right Productions
2) The Island - Soundtrack - My Name is Linkoln on Tyros4
You Tube channel "Telmo Gama" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1Pf_m...
Heavy
rains transformed Australia's landscape, as show in these two NASA
satellite images of floodplains in southwestern Queensland. The first
image was taken on September 26, 2009. By the time of the second image,
on March 26, 2011, so much rain had been driven over Australia instead
of falling on the ocean that global sea levels temporarily dropped.
(Image taken with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS) on NASA's Aqua satellite.)
When
enough raindrops fall over land instead of the ocean, they begin to add
up. New research led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR) shows that when three atmospheric patterns came together over the
Indian and Pacific oceans, they drove so much precipitation over
Australia in 2010 and 2011 that the world's ocean levels dropped
measurably.
Unlike other continents, the soils and topography of
Australia prevent almost all of its precipitation from running off into
the ocean. The 2010-11 event temporarily halted a long-term trend of
rising sea levels caused by higher temperatures and melting ice sheets.
Now
that the atmospheric patterns have snapped back and more rain is
falling over tropical oceans, the seas are rising again. In fact, with
Australia in a major drought, they are rising faster than before.
"It's
a beautiful illustration of how complicated our climate system is,"
says NCAR scientist John Fasullo, the lead author of the study.
"The
smallest continent in the world can affect sea level worldwide. Its
influence is so strong that it can temporarily overcome the background
trend of rising sea levels that we see with climate change."
The
study, with co-authors from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the
University of Colorado at Boulder, will be published next month in
Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science
Foundation, which is NCAR's sponsor, and by NASA. Consistent rising, interrupted
As the climate warms, the world's oceans have been rising in recent
decades by just more than 3 millimeters (0.1 inches) annually. This is
partly because the heat causes water to expand, and partly because
runoff from retreating glaciers and ice sheets is making its way into
the oceans.
But for an 18-month period beginning in 2010, the
oceans mysteriously dropped by about 7 millimeters (about 0.3 inches),
more than offsetting the annual rise.
Fasullo and his co-authors
published research last year demonstrating that the reason had to do
with the increased rainfall over tropical continents. They also showed
that the drop coincided with the atmospheric oscillation known as La
Nina, which cooled tropical surface waters in the eastern Pacific and
suppressed rainfall there while enhancing it over other portions of the
tropical Pacific, Africa, South America, and Australia.
But an
analysis of the historical record showed that past La Nina events only
rarely accompanied such a pronounced drop in sea level.
If North Atlantic
hurricanes are more destructive or more frequent, it may be linked to
lower levels of atmospheric pollution. Photograph: Scott Eisen/Reuters
Scientists from Britain's Meteorological Office have fingered a
new suspect in their attempt to solve the mystery of tropical storms. It
is, unexpectedly, air quality.
If North Atlantic hurricanes are more destructive or more frequent, it may be linked to lower levels of atmospheric pollution.
Conversely, sulphate aerosols and other particles from factory
chimneys, vehicle exhausts, domestic fires, power stations and other
human economic advances may have played a role in keeping tropical
storms under control, at least a little, during the 20th century.
Climate
scientist Nick Dunstone and fellow-researchers at the Met Office's
Hadley Centre in Exeter, Devon, report in the Nature Geoscience journal
there is at least circumstantial evidence that aerosols play a more
significant role in the storm cycle than anyone had expected.
The
reason it has been difficult to separate the effect is a simple one:
when humans burn fossil fuels, they release greenhouse gases that slowly
but inexorably warm the atmosphere, and therefore the oceans.
Atmosphere and ocean are together a climate system: put more energy in,
and it must go somewhere. The likely consequences, most people have
thought, are extremes of wind and rain.
However, for most of the
20th century, humans released greenhouse gases and also all sorts of
other waste at the same time: specifically, sulphate aerosols that, as
urban smog, darkened buildings, increased the acidity of the falling
rain, rotted limestone structures and condemned hundreds of thousands to
bronchial illnesses and, ultimately, to early graves.
It didn't
seem possible to separate the effects – at least, not until Britain,
western European nations and North America introduced increasingly
strict clean air legislation.
This started to give scientists and
climate modellers a chance to tease out the different effects of the two
pollutants. Aerosols are important absorbers of sunlight, and they are
also important in cloud chemistry – water vapour droplets have to
condense on something. But important in what way? Do clouds reflect
sunlight and cool the region? Or do they build up prodigious quantities
of moving water and turn into the frenzies of a tropical storm? Or,
overall, do sulphates cool the atmosphere a little and counteract global
warming − and, if so, under what conditions?
