Showing posts with label Protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Protection. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2014

As Arctic ice melts, polar bears switch diets to survive, studies say

 

Arctic polar bears may be adjusting their eating habits as their sea ice habitat melts and the furry white predators stand to lose the floating platform they depend on to hunt seals, their primary food. According to researchers, however, the bears are displaying flexible eating habits as their world changes around them.
Indeed, scientific studies indicate polar bear populations are falling as the sea ice disappears earlier each spring and forms later in the fall. But a series of papers based on analysis of polar bear poop released over the past several months indicate that at least some of the bears are finding food to eat when they come ashore, ranging from bird eggs and caribou to grass seeds and berries.
"What our results suggest is that polar bears have flexible foraging strategies," Linda Gormezano, a biologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York and a co-author of several of the papers, told NBC News.
Quinoa, a dog, finds polar bear scat
Robert Rockwell / American Museum of Natural History
Quinoa, a Dutch shepherd who was trained to sniff out polar bear scat, sits next to find. Analysis of the polar bear scat reveals the animals have a flexible foraging strategy.
The results stem from research in western Hudson Bay, near Chruchill, Manitoba, Canada, which is in the southern extent of polar bear habitat and serves as a harbinger of what the animals are likely to face throughout their Arctic range as the climate continues to warm and sea ice breaks up earlier and earlier each spring.
The flexible foraging strategy of polar bears "means that there may be more to this picture in terms of how polar bears will adjust to changing ice conditions" than indicated by models based on the spring breakup date of the sea ice and thus their access to seals, Gormezano said.
She added that nobody knows for sure how well polar bears will adapt to the changing food supply, but a big step toward an answer is to study what they eat on land "rather than assume that they may just be fasting."
Let them eat car parts
In addition to berries, birds and eggs, Andrew Derocher, a University of Alberta polar bear biologist who was not involved with the recent studies, said people have seen a polar bear drink hydraulic fluid as it was drained out of a forklift, chomp the seats of snow machines, and eat lead acid batteries.
"Polar bears will eat anything," he told NBC News. "The question is: Does is it do them any good? And everything we can see from what bears eat when they are on land is it has a very, very minimal energetic return relative to the cost."
Gormezano said the plants found in any given pile of poop were usually the same, suggesting the bears eat whatever they find in their immediate surroundings — they don't spend a lot energy searching for food. Mothers and cubs, who wander farthest inland, feast on berries found there. On the coast, where adult males linger, the poop is predominantly shoreline grass seeds.
Animal remains, however, showed no pattern, which fits with a landscape rich with nesting birds and caribou and polar bears opportunistically eating whatever crosses their path, according to a paper Gormenzano and colleague Robert Rockwell published in BMC Ecology in December 2013.
In a paper published in Polar Biology in May 2013, the researchers report observations of polar bears chasing and capturing snow geese with the efficiency of a skilled hunter — snagging one right after the other.
Polar bear eats a caribou
Robert Rockwell / American Museum of Natural History
A polar bear eats a caribou on land. Recent studies suggest polar bears have a flexible foraging strategy, which help them survive as they come ashore earlier due to melting Arctic sea ice.
"Previously, it had been thought that that would not be a very energetically profitable thing for a polar bear to do because they expend more energy in the chase than they get from consuming the food," Gormezano noted.

Read More Here


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Household Products May Harm Tree Swallows in Minnesota and Wisconsin

USGS - science for a changing world
Released: 10/23/2013 12:35:16 PM
..........
          ...

Contact Information:
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Office of Communications and Publishing
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr, MS 119
Reston, VA 20192Christine Custer 1-click interview
Phone: (608) 781-6247Marisa Lubeck 1-click interview
Phone: (303) 202-4765
0
Contamination from commercial products such as nonstick cookware and stain repellents could reduce the reproduction of tree swallows nesting in Minnesota and Wisconsin, according to a new U.S. Geological Survey study.
USGS scientists and partners found that tree swallow eggs exposed to elevated levels of these products, known as perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), were associated with a decreased chance of hatching. PFASs are common environmental contaminants that have been used in products such as water and stain repellents, nonstick cookware, surfactants such as detergents and wetting agents, and polymers (plastics). The report was recently published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.
"Even though PFASs seem to be declining in the environment, hot spots still remain," said Christine Custer, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences (UMESC) scientist and lead author of the study. "These high concentrations are localized, however, which fortunately reduces the potential for harm to swallow populations throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin."
Between 2007 and 2011, scientists compared hatching rates among tree swallow nests located at eight different study locations with different PFAS-contamination levels and sources in Minnesota and Wisconsin, including Lake Johanna and Pigs Eye Lake in the Twin Cities metropolitan area—two areas known for PFAS contamination. They tested an egg sample from each studied nest for PFAS concentrations and compared those results to how well the rest of the eggs hatched.
The USGS-led study suggested that tree swallow hatching rates declined at high PFAS concentrations (as high as 150-200 nanograms per gram of wet weight), which are lower than the concentrations that have affected other bird species in laboratory studies. This difference may be due to behavioral effects or other factors not accounted for in the laboratory studies. It could also mean that tree swallows are especially sensitive to these toxins.
PFASs can enter the environment through contaminated groundwater and surface water runoff from plants that manufacture or use PFAS products, from household waste water that passes through treatment plans, and from airborne chemicals settling on the ground. The Mississippi River downstream of St. Paul, Minn., may have been contaminated by a landfill used to dispose of PFAS-filled waste products.
Because of global exposure to humans and wildlife, selected PFASs were phased out of production starting in 2000.
This study was led by the USGS in collaboration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State University of New York at Albany and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Copies of the report are available by contacting Christine Custer at ccuster@usgs.gov or (608) 781-6247.
For more information on this and other Mississippi River Basin and contaminant-related avian studies, please visit the USGS UMESC website.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, July 29, 2013

Researchers seeking clues in ‘unprecedented’ dolphin die-off


Researchers seeking clues in ‘unprecedented’ dolphin die-off // VIDEO, MAP, PHOTO GALLERY

Dolphin mystery
Dolphin mystery
Bottle-nosed dolphin Roux, right, clowns around with his friend Jett at Gulf World in Panama City Beach. Roux was rescued from Louisiana and participates in a few of the dolphin shows, while Jett was born at the marine park.

Heather Leiphart | The News Herald
Published: Saturday, July 27, 2013 at 18:03 PM.
PANAMA CITY BEACH — For the last three years, dolphins have been dying at an unprecedented rate in the Gulf of Mexico, and experts say there’s still no end in sight.
“The length and the severity of this event is unprecedented in the Gulf,” said Chris Robbins, a scientist and senior manager for restoration planning with Ocean Conservancy. “More than 1,000 animals have stranded and more than 95 percent of those have been dead. … The mortalities we’re seeing are far above what the historical average has been.”
Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) declared an Unusual Mortality Event (UME) in December 2010 for dolphins in the northern Gulf of Mexico, the area from the Texas/Louisiana border to Franklin County.
Since the event began in February 2010, 1,026 strandings have occurred through July 21. The event is the most severe ever recorded in the Gulf, with 95 percent of strandings ending in mortality.
“It’s the longest in duration and highest number of strandings in the UME program,” said Erin Fougeres, Marine Mammal Stranding Network Program administrator for NOAA. “In this case, this unusual mortality event has been going on since just prior to the oil spill.”
By NOAA definition, a UME is “a stranding that is unexpected, involves a significant die-off of any marine mammal population and demands immediate response.”
But, response is difficult when the cause of the UME is still unknown.

Click for  video
See more photos
Interactive map

Oil’s role
Although the UME began two months prior to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, researchers are not ruling out oil dispersant as a factor.
“This unusual mortality event actually started before the oil spill in February 2010, but when the oil spill happened there was a spike in strandings, and they’ve been high ever since,” Robbins said. “It does raise aquestion to the extent of which the oil spill has exacerbated the UME.”
Robbins said many of the symptoms observed in the stranding events are consistent with those of marine mammals that have been exposed to oil.
“What they’re seeing in these animals is a compromised immune system,” Robbins said. “It may be like a cancer patient with a compromised immune system coming down with something else because they’ve been exposed to a virus or some other type of contaminant.”
Experts are investigating what role brucella bacteria may have in relation to the UME. Thus far, 27 out of 107 dolphins were positive or suspected to be positive for brucella, a common cause of abortions in the marine mammals.
Some animals also are showing signs of pneumonia and adrenal gland abnormalities, Fougeres reported.
“We don’t have any definitive cause of the mortalities at this point,” Fougeres said. “There may not be any one thing that’s killing off the animals. There may be more than one factor involved.”
NOAA has formally recognized 59 marine mammal UMEs in the U.S. since 1991, but has determined cause for just 25 of them.
In the same timeframe, the Gulf of Mexico has seen 11 UMEs involving dolphins. Fougeres reported the most common cause of the previous events was morbillivirus, a highly infectious virus that includes agents of measles and canine distemper.
“We’re trying to rule out the most common causes of UMEs that have happened in the Gulf in the past,” Fougeres said. Morbillivirus “doesn’t appear to be the case.”
The highest number of strandings has occurred in Louisiana, followed by Mississippi, Alabama and the Florida Panhandle.
“Fortunately, for the Florida Panhandle, they haven’t really been too much above average since 2010,” Fougeres said.


Read More Here


***************************************************************
File:Bottlenose dolphin with young.JPG

File:Bottlenose Dolphins.jpg

File:Dolphins gesture language.jpg

File:Bottlenose Dolphin KSC04pd0178 (cropped).jpg
Author : NASA
 
***************************************************************
Enhanced by Zemanta